An exercise in fragmentation: Limiting Android installs to device models

An exercise in fragmentation: Limiting Android installs to device models

As if there were insufficient fragmentation problems with Android, app makers head out and make it even worse when they restrict setups to particular gadgets.

Here I sit, with a hardly six-month-old Galaxy S4, and yet I can not utilize an app offered for the gadget, due to the fact that the variation of the S4 that I have is the S4 Active, Samsung’s most current water resistant phone.

It’s one of the grating concerns I have with utilizing an Android gadget. In spite of all of the great that Google has actually done to suppress the issues that designers experience with fragmentation, a particular kind of gadget and app maker is identified to divide and dominate Android, a handful of gadgets at a time.

In the previous 2 days, a set of apps with gadget limitations have actually appeared in the Play Store: The long-awaited Android variation of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s iView app, and Foxtel’s Go app

What is concurrently intriguing and discouraging is that instead of limiting the implementation of the apps by Android variation number or screen resolution, both have actually taken the course of just enabling particular gadgets to install it with making use of a whitelist.

For why this is a concern, simply take a look at the charming list of gadgets in the Play Developer Console that appear when a look for “S4” is carried out.

The issues kick into equipment when you understand that Samsung deals with “S4” as both a gadget name and a total term for a collection of gadgets. Not just does the business make a “Samsung Galaxy S4”, however it likewise offers a “Samsung Galaxy S4 Active”, “Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom”, “Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini”, “Samsung Galaxy S4 Google Play Edition”, and a “Samsung Galaxy S4 Duo”, along with having a motley collection of design numbers.

So when an app maker states its app is supported on the Galaxy S4, perhaps it is, and perhaps it isn’t. When it comes to the ABC app, after a preliminary rejection, about an hour later on, the app was permitted to be set up on my S4. When it comes to the Foxtel app, in spite of having all the efficiency and other requirements to run the app, I was declined by Foxtel’s gadget whitelisting.

Upon asking why it enables one S4 design and not another, Foxtel reacted by stating, “each Android gadget acts in a different way and requires to be inspected to guarantee it supplies the ideal Foxtel experience which material is provided firmly”.

Despite the app having Samsung exclusivity, the business stated it would “like to get Foxtel Go on as numerous gadgets as possible and are striving to do so”.

Making choices on app accessibility based upon phone designs is not the proper way to set about Android app advancement, and not does anything to assist the Android environment.

What is the point of having an uniform platform period throughout various gadgets if apps are going to neglect ideal gadgets that can utilizing them?

It would make little sense in the PC world to limit an app to just Lenovos or HP computer systems, and it makes simply as little sense in the mobile world.

Read More

Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *